When a user accesses a web page, a process starts, so the content is shown on the screen. The request’s response is complete only after processing the command, which allows delivering a page capable of receiving interactions. Who programs this is the web designer and he should always make the following comparison: Client-Side Rendering vs Server-Side Rendering.
These two ways of loading a page have france phone number data important differences. There are different pros and cons involved in each mode.
In this post, we will make a comparison between Client-Side Rendering and Server-Side Rendering. The content will cover the following topics:
- What is Client-Side Rendering?
- What is Server-Side Rendering?
- What is the importance of Client-Side blendee’s connection ecosystem is enriched with new integrations Rendering or Server-Side Rendering for SEO?
- What are the pros and cons in choosing Client-Side Rendering?
- What are the pros and cons in choosing Server-Side Rendering?
- Client-Side Rendering vs Server-Side Rendering: which should you use?
Keep reading to understand!
Download this post by entering your email below
The access command information is sent to the lack data server, which returns with a simple HTML containing the JavaScript information that will load the entire site.
This is a much more modern rendering method since there is no receiving of an entire HTML page. From a technical point of view, this loading mode makes the process more quickly, requiring less from the server and the browser.
The CSR method is always an option, but it is always important to evaluate the pros and cons, which we will still do in this content.
Check out an illustration of GBK Soft company about how the Client Side Rendering process happens:
What is Server-Side Rendering?
The Server-Side Rendering (SSR) mode is a method considered older and heavier than CSR. Here, when a user accesses a website, this request’s information is sent directly to the server, which responds with a file with the complete HTML code. From this content, the website will be properly loaded in full.
In this method, the server creates a page from the HTML code and the user’s access data who is accessing the site. SSR has spent a lot of time being the most common way to render pages, but analysis and discussions about which method is the best have questioned the use of this technique.
See how this process is illustrated:
What is the importance of Client-Side Rendering or Server-Side Rendering for SEO?
Another comparison needs to be made: Client-Side Rendering vs Server-Side Rendering on SEO. The way web pages are loaded directly impacts the ranking of sites. This is because Google’s algorithms are always looking to detect which pages offer the best user experience.
When a site takes too long to load or has difficulty showing part of its content, there is a drop in the experience. To avoid this, Google programs its algorithms to better rank websites that can prevent these problems. The important point of this issue is: rendering is essential to generate a successful experience.
It is important to note that the choice between CSR and SSR affects how a website will be accessed and, consequently, how it will be within Google’s parameters. Therefore, it is important to emphasize a crucial issue: most of the sites rendered in SSR are optimized to be more easily found on Google.
Because this method is the most traditional and considered the standard, it has a better SEO performance. Therefore, when choosing a rendering method, web designers need to understand which SSR pages have an advantage over CSR when we talk about optimization for better ranking.
What are the pros and cons in choosing Client-Side Rendering?
When analyzing the Client Side Rendering vs Server-Side Rendering comparison, it is necessary to address each’s pros and cons. A choice based on extensive information avoids errors that can impair the performance of a site. First, let’s check which are the main pros in favor of Client-Side Rendering.
Pros
CSR is the most agile rendering process. The response offering a website ready for interaction is much faster when there is no need to load a complete HTML page. In this case, it is enough to perform the processing through a JavaScript file.
Another important advantage is the server usage level. CSR is much lower, precisely because you don’t have to deal with extensive HTML. Thus, more power is available to load the user’s next requests, making the experience better.
Finally, this is considered the best choice in web application development. In general, CSR makes the navigation agile and makes the experience practically flawless.
Cons
We need to talk about bad performance in search engines. Because it is based on JavaScript, CSR can get in the way of website ranking, as Google faces difficulties finding it.
The way CSR rendering is done can generate a slow loading the first time the site is accessed. It’s a one-time behavior, but it can generate a bad first perception about the page.